GUARDIAN'S GLENDENNING BRANDS RANGERS FC AS HUNS
NOW I know there won't be many of you reading this who take the Guardian. Actually there are few folk anywhere who buy it.
However, its online presence and penetration is phenomenal. According to the website, Soccer Lens, it has 33 million readers. That's just slightly more than half the population of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Which makes it important that the Guardian.co.uk is as tightly policed as the ''hard''copy of the newspaper.
Something though, which the Guardian, on its pages and online, most certainly is, is the most politically correct daily publication in Britain, if not the world.
Not for a moment would anyone on the Guardian ever think of describing a disabled person as a "cripple." Quite right too. The Guardian's choice would no doubt be "differently abled." All minorities are treated with kid gloves.
Not so Rangers FC. Step forward Barry Glendenning, the deputy sports editor of Guardian.co.uk who, on Wednesday afternoon Twittered an obscenity about Rangers.
It seems he fancies himself as a bit of a tipster and the twit's Twitter message read: "Best bet of the day/month/year? Bursaspor to beat Rangers @ 3-1. The Huns Big Cup record is awful."
Now I remember when the folk who wrote sport for the Guardian were giants of the inky business. I often shared a press box down south with David Lacy, who was not only a fine writer and good judge, but an absolute gentleman.
Then there was a period in the early 1980s in the Midlands when the Guardian's man there, Charlie Burgess, and I became pals who shared many a balti in Birmingham's curry triangle after a midweek match. Big Charlie was wonderfully diffident, supremely talented and charming.
It is a tradition which is carried on to this day by Kevin McCarra, whose match report on the Manchester United-Rangers Champions League encounter was a model of balance and insight.
Glendenning clearly does not belong to that tradition. Perhaps the fact he lists being a stand-up comedian as one of his talents explains a great deal. Maybe he's better at being funny than he is as a tipster, for anyone wading in on Bursaspor at 3-1 would have lost their dough.
It is just the latest in a long line of the use of the offensive word, Huns. The last was in the Scotsman a mere fortnight ago, which led to a signed apology by editor John McLellan.
It will be interesting to see if the Guardian's celebrated editor, Alan Rusbridger also grovels. Though this time any apology should not be directed only at those who support Rangers, but at the club itself. For it was Rangers FC which was the target for Glendenning's slur.
It is a matter for anyone who read his twitter, who may wish to get in touch with the Guardian's editor to complain, or to contact the Press Complaints Commission.
The actual origin and true meaning of the word Hun was well researched and documented on a still available previous blog, should a recap be required.
It is hard to see what prompted such a disgraceful slur, with the use of a word which the Guardian approved anti sectarian organisation, Nil By Mouth, has long listed as a banned word.
As far as I can see, Glendenning has no ties with Scotland. In fact his background does not even appear to be British, as his previous employment on his biography says he worked for the Hot Press magazine in Ireland, and with the Irish Sunday Independent.
What makes his low insult more dangerous is the number of people who are exposed to his opinions. He is often found at the helm of Guardian Unlimited, which provides minute by minute reports and which features live coverage of Champions League games and internationals, and he also appears on Guardian Unlimited's football podcast, Football Weekly, hosted by well known television broadcaster, James Richardson.
And get this. In an interview on the Soccer Lens site, Glendenning says : "Some of the correspondence we get from fans is often astonishingly offensive."
So what the devil does he think comparing Rangers chairman, Alastair Johnston, chief executive, Martin Bain, manager Walter Smith, captain and Scotland's Player of the Year, Davie Weir, and all the others at Ibrox, with Adolf Hitler, Adolf Eichmann, Josef Mengle and the rest of the Nazis is?
Offensive does not even begin to describe it.
Now I know there are some Rangers supporters out there who believe it is all just banter. They should ponder on what might be the outcry if a newspaper was to refer to any other Scottish club and its supporters in a similarly derogatory way.
Aye, I thought so.
What, in my view, Glendenning's sordid slur showed is that so many press people and other media folk believe Rangers and their supporters are fair game. The fans and the Ibrox club can be insulted in a way they would never dream of in the case of any other organisation, institution or people from any other section of the population.
I wouldn't go so far as to say Glendenning is a bigot. And certainly shrink from branding him as being mentally crippled. Differently abled in the mental department though is a possibility.
20 Comments:
Another excellent article David ,keep up the good work.
Well David i would go as far as calling Mr Glendening a bigot, Mr Glendenning you are a bigot for using and calling Rangers by that sectarian word Hun.
Who says this is sectarian? What AUTHORITY has made it illegal ? If Rangers fans acted like "Marauding Huns" (in Attila fashion), what is the problem in this description. Are you offended by the word RANGERS because the do not "ride the RANGE" ???
Get a life FFS !!!
Another example of why Mr Leggat occupies this position in the world of sports journalism.
The continous citation of Nil By Mouth is laughable. The circumstances of this "classification" of the word hun was a brainstorming session among schoolchildren.
The inmates of Follow Follow regularly bleat about the sectarian nature of this word. "Hun means protestant" they wail, "Nil By Mouth say so" they gnash, "a man was found guilty of sectarian breach of the peace for wearing a T-shirt with 'hun' on it" (forget the dozens of cases where no charges are made) they foam.
Regardless, Rangers fans will always be referred to as huns. Apart from the fact that fans of all teams refer to rangers fans as such (why not take a look at the Jambo Kickback forum before or after a Rangers game? Those notoriously anti-protestant bigots also refer to the huns as ...huns)it has also been adopted by people with little or no interest in Scottish football as it is an entirely apt description.
Just ask the citizens of Manchester or Barcelona. I'm sure they'd compare the huns to the huns - not the Nazis you understand, although those 'Red Hand Salutes', BNP newspaper sellers and C18/ Chelsea/ Hamburg links are confusing, but the marauding huns who laid waste to many a city in days of yore. A legacy their modern namesakes appear keen to continue.
To all you mhutant tarriers reading this. Nil By Mouth has deemed it sectarian but of course, sectarianism only works one-way with the bead-rattlers.
As a Rangers fan I am not in the least offended by whatever anyone from the dark side of the city calls me. I've been to over 200 Old Firm games and never left greeting because of any chant. This, however, is not the point. The Guardian and its readership set themselves as self-appointed 'guardians' of political correctness and should condemn such shoddy journalism as they would be quick to do with anyone else.
In addition, Manchester and Barcelona, cities laid to waste? Slight exaggeration I think. Manchester city centre was of course laid to waste in the recent past but not by Rangers fans and not by any 'huns'. Recent events in Lincoln should remind some people that the difference between a riot and a few arrests is in the media's unbiased interpretation. On that note, Chris Sutton did well in Lincoln in his first (and maybe last) managerial post . Maybe Dunfermline players were to blame.
London & Manchester where wasted not by H*ns but by the cowardly IRA murderers of women and children and sung about the Bheggers of the Paul Gadd Arena, BJK
I would be delighted if Anonymous at 30 September 2010 15:19 above would kindly explain to us all why Sellik fhans sing 'Go Home ya Huns' to Hearts fans when they visit Celtic Park.
Whatever can they mean?
The slurs freely expressed about Rangers and its supporters, combined with the "Get Out of Jail Free" card given to Septic and its supporters is quite shocking and disgraceful.
Of course it is fine for fans to give others the wind up, but it is entirely another matter for newspapers & other media to betray the bigotry of their contributors.
What will they say when 3 in a row is confirmed?
Laughable stuff.
Danny Mcgrain isn't a hun.
Amoruso is a hun.
Jock Stein wasn't a hun.
Maurice Johnston is a hun.
Huns will always be huns and some will become huns and huns will be huns.
Would it not be easier for you huns to just accept you are a hun and get on with hunning?
After all,it just means you are a rangers supporter - a hun.
It does make me chuckle when the members of Anonymous come on here all gay and lighthearted to tell Rangers supporters to get a life; as if being called a hun could cause offense! This from the same people that went greeting and wailing to almost any official body they could think off, including a few numpties belonging to the government of Eire, because Rangers supporters, among others, had the temerity to call them fenians.
This is a word that many who believe that they have Irish blood are quite happy to use to describe themselves, particularly if they say they belong to the 'anti-British' persuasion. Basically, we (not the Royal 'we' I hasten to add, but the Celtic 'we', wouldn't want to offend anyone!) can use this word but nobody else can use it because it means something different when you say it and we find it very very offensive.
However, I concede that they have a point with regard to the double entendre of the word fenian. Nevertheless, I think they're wankers. Now I don't actually believe that the stands at parkhead are filled with supporters masturbating furiously throughout the match. They are wankers though.
Which of the two descriptors do the wankers find most offensive though, the actual wanker or the metaphorical wanker? Or both? Are all wankers offensive, both metaphorical and literal? Should governments intervene to have the use of the word outlawed when it's applied to the wankers at Parkhead or the wider support of CFC? Or should wanking be made illegal and all wankers incarcerated? There are some who believe so!
Personally, I couldn't give two slangs for intercourse about the misattribution of the word hun when used individually or collectively to describe the Rangers support. You see, I know better. I know when the term was first used in Scottish football and who it was directed against and it wasn't the Rangers support.
The wankers know as well.
I think the comment above proves that secretly, deep down, beyond the bile fueled rants, Rangers fans know that hun isn't sectarian. Offensive yes, that's why it's used, but the desperate attempt to add a religious element to the slur is hilarious; evidenced by desperately referencing Nil By Mouth's schoolchildren's project as some sort of etched in stone definition.
In answer to previous poster's questions as to why Celtic fans will refer to Hearts supporters as huns (we prefer Diet huns or mini huns or perhaps edinburgh huns) i have to say I'm surprised even the average hun couldn't work that one out. hearts are a very definition of rangers fans without the busfare with their right wing leanings, union flags and despicable away support.
Although to be fair to the diet huns, they also refer to the huns as huns. take a look at their forums or indeed the Livinstone forum, Aberdeen forum, dundee forum or any other Scottish football club forum. Everyone recognises the huns as huns.
I suppose it'll be because they all hate "prodesints". Any other ideas?
Im old enough to remember when celtic supporters were referred to as huns. Was this because the glitterdome was closed during the war for a short period after the greatest fans in the world sang pro nazi songs?
yes, correct! It was also because we famously left the lights on to direct the Luftwaffe to the clyde.
I notice that noone was able to answer my points as to why supporters of other scottish teams, which by natuire of Scottish demographics will be of a protestant majority, refer to the huns as huns. Is it self hatred? Is it that protestant supporters of other clubs can see theat Rangers fans suit such a moniker and it has nothing to do with religion? Or is it that a hun is a rangers fan or player, that could also be extended to those of a loyalist, right wing bent who don't follow rangers, and has nothing whatsoever to do with religion and ergo is not sectarian despite what the animals say?
Jesus, just when I thought I'd read it all I stumble across this forum.
Rangers fans are huns, end of story, celtic fans are tims, dons fans are sheep shaggers, anyone getting upset or outraged about any of those terms needs to get a life!
If Leggat wants to get upset he should be condemning the Rangers songbook of late, no pope of rome has been blasted out at the last two away games, mock outrage on here = zero.
I'm a dons fan, they can sing what they like but don't give me all this rubbish about the word huns being offensive, the two cheeks are as bad as each other, both can't wait to jump aboard the mope bus.
Why don't they just refer to us as people? The whole wide world know that WE ARE THE PEOPLE!
There is nothing sectarian about hun - except if you concede that most huns are sectarians. The amount of work being put in by Rangers and their supporters to cast themselves as victims is laughable. If you want the name of your club to carry a more positive image then stop your own club telling UEFA that your nazi salutes while supporting your team in Israel were really redhand salutes (which barely improves them) or your grotesque pseudo-patriotic hijacking of all things pertaining to the British military which is nauseating and offensive to those of us who have actually served - unlike your own employees who in the hour of greatest need made sure they were safely ensconced in reserved occupations despite their lack of a trade - in Harland and Wolff and other yards. It was because so few Rangers employees fought in the war that they were called huns - and always will be.
Try researching the war record of Celtic and Rangers staff during the two world wars and you may actually understand...
rangers staff 5 celtic staff 0 lol
Remember when various Rangers messageboards tried to start a campaign to refer to Celtic supporters as "huns"? Funnily enough, the expression wasn't deemed to have any religious connotation at that point. Only after the predictable failure of this campaign did we get the laughable attempt to brand the term sectarian, despite that fact that it is used by supporters of all clubs and all denominations to refer to Rangers supporters.
The best thing about the word "hun" is the fact that huns hate it so much!
If a hun is a hun,then he is a hun,which part of the word 'hun' do you peepil fail tae understand,are you so thick that you cannot accept it as fact,you are the huns,deal with it.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home